![]() |
W.J.
McCabe Chapter |
![]()
Section 6(f)(3) of the LWCF Act contains strong provisions to protect Federal
investments and the quality of assisted resources. The law is firm but flexible.
It recognizes the likelihood that changes in land use or development may make
some assisted areas obsolete over time, particularly in rapidly changing urban
areas. At the same time, the law discourages casual "discards" of park
and recreation facilities by ensuring that changes or "conversions from
recreation use" will bear a cost - a cost that assures taxpayers that
investments in the "national recreation estate" will not be
squandered. The LWCF Act contains a clear and common sense provision to protect
grant-assisted areas from conversions.
SEC. 6(f)(3) No property acquired or developed with assistance under this section shall, without the approval of the Secretary, be converted to other than public outdoor recreation uses. The Secretary shall approve such conversion only if he finds it to be in accord with the then existing comprehensive statewide outdoor recreation plan and only upon such conditions as he deems necessary to assure the substitution of other recreation properties of at least equal fair market value and of reasonably equivalent usefulness and location.
This "anti-conversion" requirement applies to all parks and other
sites that have been the subject of Land and Water grants of any type, whether
for acquisition of parkland, development or rehabilitation of facilities. In
many cases, even a relatively small LWCF grant (e.g., for development of a
picnic shelter) in a park of hundreds or even thousands of acres provides
anti-conversion protection to the entire park site.
To ensure the continued effectiveness of Section 6(f)(3) protection, several
management tools have been developed to monitor and correct changes in assisted
sites from year to year. For example, the NPS requires on-site inspections of
all grant-assisted areas and facilities at least once in every five years most
of which are conducted by cooperating state agencies.
Another important tool to ensure good communication between grantors and
grantees is the "6(f)(3) project boundary map." With each application,
the grantee submits a dated project boundary map showing the park area to be
covered by Section 6(f)(3) anti-conversion protections. This map need not be a
formal survey document, but it contains enough site-specific information to
serve several purposes: